Julian
Peasant
注册日期: Oct 2002
来自:
发帖数: 7 |
关于中立的阵营……
刚刚在TSR的论坛上看到一个题目，是讨论中立的阵营的，但是，最后好像没有结果……以下是原文的问题……
Neutral?!
Who ever came up with this idea?! Either an act is right (and thus ‘good’) or wrong (and thus ‘evil’); how can you have an act that is neither? You may have different degrees of severity of evil, but is neutral really the right term to express this?!
If we take good to mean beneficial/right/in-accord with the natural order of things/not abusive, perverting or despoiling of something that is in accord with the natural order, and evil to mean harmful/wrong/out of accord with the order of things/abusive, perverting or despoiling of something that is in accord with the natural order, then what place is there for ‘neutral’?
Look at ‘good’ in the PHB and you see the words at the centre of goodness are respect and dignity, whilst the words at the centre of evil are the debasement and destruction of the innocent (those who do no wrong – the ‘non evils’ in other words; those in harmony with the natural order)…essentially evil is an attempt to overthrow the natural order and create something perverted and debasing. Good is about not debasing or abusing, but about being respectful and treating a creature as it should be according to its role in the natural order….and taking action to protect this order should it become threatened.
Neutral with regards to Law (organised regimented society where you live as a specialised part within a division of labour set-up and your behaviour is controlled by social edict) and Chaos (autonomous individuals who live as skill-generalised self-reliant independent person who does not answer to a social order) I can understand as a desire for a life subject only to light govt interference, but regards good and evil?!!
You could have neutral in the sense of “unconcerned”, in the way most other animals live, but such would not be an alignment open to sentients (who because of their power and freedom are moral creatures – that is they are capable of understanding the world and their relationship/responsibilities to such).
Perhaps what would be more sensible is a 7th attribute – “Holiness” (for want of a better term): that increases for every good act and decreases for every evil act your character does. You could then have game effects that reflect your position on such (whether very high – perhaps gain “divine grace” as a paladin does, or very low – perhaps gain charm ability like a vampire, or assassinate ability or somesuch?).
Thoughts anyone?
我想请教一下，以中国人的观点……应该怎么诠释中立阵营呢！？
__________________
我是新人……
由 Julian 于 10-07-2002 20:48 最后编辑
向版主反映这个帖子 | IP: 已记录
|
10-07-2002 20:46
